In a revealing and emotionally charged interview conducted by journalist Scott Pelley for 60 Minutes on April 13, 2025, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confronted the world with a stark portrayal of his country’s suffering and a comprehensive articulation of the moral and geopolitical dimensions of the war with Russia. Three years into Russia’s full-scale invasion, Zelenskyy also delivered an urgent plea for continued international—especially American—support in the face of both external aggression and emerging internal political instability within the United States. Speaking from an embattled Ukraine and mindful of shifting winds in Washington, Zelenskyy’s words captured the profound human cost of the conflict, the erosion of trust in diplomacy with Vladimir Putin, and the growing fragility of Ukraine’s vital alliance with the West.
Zelenskyy’s opening remarks cut to the heart of the crisis: Russia’s actions were not a historical accident or a regional dispute, but a deliberate campaign of destruction aimed at extinguishing Ukrainian sovereignty. He invoked recent atrocities to illustrate this point: a missile strike on a playground in Kryvyi Rih that claimed the lives of nine children, and the April 13 attack on the northeastern city of Sumy—an attack that coincided with Palm Sunday and proved to be the deadliest single strike on Ukrainian civilians since 2023. According to local officials, two Russian ballistic missiles killed at least 34 people, including children, and injured over 100 others. The strikes hit a trolleybus and the Sumy State University conference center, both located in densely populated areas. The timing, which coincided with religious services and a children’s theater event, underlined what Zelenskyy called Russia’s “blatant disregard for human life and international norms,” with Ukrainian intelligence indicating the possible use of cluster munitions.
Standing amid shrapnel-pierced swing sets and scorched memorials in Kryvyi Rih, and decrying the “blood-soaked pavements” in Sumy, Zelenskyy implored the world to look into the faces of the dead and wounded children. He argued that these faces alone provide the moral clarity needed to understand this war. By highlighting such tragedies, Zelenskyy underscored his unwavering stance: any talk of ceasefires, negotiations, or “neutrality” must recognize that Ukraine is the victim and Russia the aggressor. “Trust in Russia,” he said, “has been extinguished by blood.”
The human toll has been staggering. Since 2022, approximately 13,000 civilians have been killed, more than 600 of them children, while at least 1,700 schools and 780 hospitals and clinics have been damaged or destroyed by Russian munitions. The Sumy strike alone added dozens of civilian casualties to this grim tally. Military losses are equally devastating: as many as 100,000 Ukrainian soldiers have died defending their homeland. For Zelenskyy, the financial cost of the war pales in comparison to the immeasurable cost in human lives. “There is no higher price,” he said. “We have given all our money… but most important, we gave the lives of our people.”
Yet Ukraine’s struggle is not only a national or regional one; Zelenskyy stressed that it carries immense geopolitical implications. He directed his message in particular at shifting political attitudes in the United States, where President Donald Trump’s administration has begun re-examining Ukraine’s role in the conflict. Trump’s well-documented admiration for Vladimir Putin and his recent disparagement of Zelenskyy as a “dictator” have, in Zelenskyy’s view, emboldened Russian aggression and undermined the clarity of fact-based discourse in America. The Ukrainian president expressed incredulity that any U.S. leader could witness Ukraine’s suffering—whether in places like Sumy, Kryvyi Rih, or across the bombed-out landscapes of eastern Ukraine—and still suggest that Russia is not the clear aggressor.
Zelenskyy recalled a disastrous meeting in the Oval Office earlier in the year, during which Russian narratives were echoed by certain Trump officials and Vice President JD Vance. The insinuation that both sides were equally at fault enraged him, as did vague suggestions that Ukraine itself had sparked the conflict. Such equivocations, he argued, erase the moral distinction between victim and perpetrator. When asked if he would welcome a visit from President Trump, Zelenskyy responded emphatically: yes, but not for show. He wants Trump to see the devastated cities, ruined hospitals, and grieving families firsthand, to confront the human cost of Putin’s war without the filter of Russian disinformation.
Despite these frustrations, Zelenskyy made clear that the U.S. remains an indispensable ally for Ukraine. Washington has provided roughly $175 billion in aid, most of it military assistance critical for containing Russian advances. However, Zelenskyy spoke candidly about his anxiety over America’s changing political dynamics: “The United States is our strategic strong partner,” he said, but he also admitted to harboring doubts about the durability of that partnership, given the Trump administration’s wavering commitment and periodic suspension of aid. Without U.S. support, Ukraine would risk catastrophic human and territorial losses. More than a mere act of charity, Zelenskyy insisted, American aid is a strategic investment in democracy and European stability: “By giving us weapons, other countries are protecting their own people.”
The April 13 strike on Sumy, which occurred just as a Trump-appointed envoy, Steve Witkoff, was meeting with Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg, further complicated the U.S. role. The attack underscored, in the view of many European leaders, Russia’s cynical approach to any proposed peace efforts. European Union foreign ministers convened in Luxembourg the following day, already outraged by the scale and timing of Russia’s brutality. French President Emmanuel Macron condemned the strike as a “blatant disregard for human lives,” while German Chancellor-designate Friedrich Merz labeled it a “serious war crime.” Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk described it as “the Russian version of a ceasefire,” mocking the Kremlin’s ability to feign diplomacy while launching deadly attacks on civilians.
This unified European moral clarity contrasted sharply with the more muted American response. President Trump condemned the attack in Sumy as “terrible” but added that he was told it might have been “a mistake.” He pivoted to blaming former President Joe Biden for “failing diplomacy,” repeating the refrain that “this is not my war.” These statements, along with reported justifications of Putin’s actions by Vice President Vance, fueled Ukrainian accusations that Russian narratives have gained a troubling foothold in American politics. Radosław Sikorski, Poland’s Foreign Minister, called the timing of the Sumy attack a “mocking answer” to U.S. peace initiatives and warned against assuming that Russia’s symbolic gestures in negotiations signify genuine readiness to end the war.
Meanwhile, the war’s intensity has not subsided. In addition to the Sumy missile strikes, the Ukrainian Air Force reported more than 60 Iranian-made Shahed drones launched by Russia across the country that same night, resulting in explosions in Zaporizhzhia and Odesa and injuring multiple civilians. These attacks serve a dual purpose for Russia: targeting Ukraine’s military infrastructure while terrorizing civilians. Zelenskyy insisted they are part of a strategy designed to exhaust Ukrainian morale and test the West’s resolve.
Against this backdrop, a major policy shift appears to be taking shape in Berlin. Incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who is replacing Olaf Scholz, indicated a willingness to authorize the delivery of Taurus long-range cruise missiles to Ukraine—weaponry requested by Kyiv for months. Merz stated he would proceed in agreement with European partners, noting that France and the U.K. already supply similar arms. This marks a stark departure from Scholz’s more cautious approach. According to leaked recordings, Scholz had refused to deliver Taurus missiles for fear of escalation, specifically worrying that Germany would be drawn more directly into the conflict if it had to oversee targeting decisions.
Zelenskyy’s vision of peace is resolute: it must include the full restoration of Ukraine’s territorial integrity and accountability for war crimes. He insists that any ceasefire failing to address these fundamentals simply sets the stage for renewed aggression. Toward that end, he has proposed the deployment of an international peacekeeping force—potentially including U.S. and NATO forces—to protect Ukrainian airspace rather than place foreign boots on the ground. Air defense, not occupation, would be the key to preventing further atrocities like the one in Sumy.
Former President Trump’s repeated assertion that he could end the war swiftly has met with Zelenskyy’s skepticism. The Ukrainian leader points to ongoing attacks—like the Sumy strike and similar strikes in the cities of Kryvyi Rih, Zaporizhzhia, and Odesa—as proof of Putin’s untrustworthy nature and the futility of expecting a quick resolution. The conflict, Zelenskyy stressed, cannot be resolved by simple declarations or handshake photo ops if one side remains committed to terrorizing the other.
Zelenskyy concluded his 60 Minutes interview by emphasizing what he considers the conflict’s true stakes: nothing less than global security. He warned that if Putin’s aggression goes unanswered, it will signal to other authoritarian regimes that brutal force will be tolerated if deployed with strategic cunning. This would threaten not only Ukraine’s survival but also the integrity of the NATO alliance and the international order itself. “There won’t be a safe place for anyone,” Zelenskyy warned, referencing the brazen attacks on civilian centers and the potential for a wider conflagration should Russia see any negotiation efforts as weakness.
For now, the European Union remains unified in its condemnation and its willingness to provide additional support—illustrated by plans for further sanctions and military aid. The question, however, lingers in Washington: will the United States fortify its commitment, recognizing that acts like the Sumy attack are not tragic accidents but deliberate acts of terror? Or will images of blood-soaked streets and grieving families fade from American headlines? With every new missile strike, Zelenskyy’s plea grows more urgent: this war is not merely Ukraine’s fight; it is a defining test of the world’s willingness to stand against unprovoked aggression—and the outcome will shape the global order for decades to come.
Gros News 
Leave a comment