In a statement emblematic of his unorthodox economic messaging and self-congratulatory rhetorical style, U.S. President Donald J. Trump declared on Monday that he had effectively “solved inflation” in the United States, invoking recent economic data and market behavior as justification. The claim was made during a meeting in the Oval Office with President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador, a diplomatic engagement that became a platform for the American president to tout his perceived domestic economic victories amid mounting global financial instability.
Trump’s pronouncement followed a significant and unexpected upswing in global equity markets earlier that day, a surge that analysts widely attributed to his administration’s decision to temporarily ease some of the more aggressive tariff measures that had been integral to his trade war strategy, particularly those targeting Chinese imports. This partial retreat from what Trump has repeatedly characterized as a “reciprocal” tariff regime appeared to calm investor fears, which had intensified in prior weeks amid erratic policy signals from Washington and growing concerns over the geopolitical ramifications of prolonged economic nationalism.
Citing the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ monthly consumer price index (CPI) report for March, which recorded a year-on-year inflation rate of 2.4%, Trump interpreted the figure as definitive proof of his administration’s triumph over inflationary pressures. “We have to solve problems, and we already solved inflation,” he told assembled members of the press, before proceeding to characterize the economic figures as “incredible,” while linking the data point directly to the recent rally in stock markets. The president’s conflation of market performance with consumer price stabilization — a correlation that mainstream economists typically regard as indirect and tenuous — underscored the extent to which he continues to evaluate macroeconomic success through the lens of investor sentiment and equity valuations.
Further elaborating his position, Trump reiterated a core theme of his presidency: the assertion that the United States has for decades been the victim of systematic exploitation by foreign economic powers, a grievance he claims to be redressing through aggressive trade realignment and protectionist measures. “We’re not letting other countries take advantage of this country like they have for the last 40 years,” he stated, gesturing toward a broader historical narrative in which his administration functions as a corrective force reversing decades of policy failure in international commerce.
On April 14, 2025, during the same Oval Office meeting with El Salvador’s President, Trump again declared that he had “solved inflation,” referencing the newly released CPI figures. The Bureau of Labor Statistics report indicated a 0.1% decrease in the all-items index on a seasonally adjusted basis for March following a 0.2% increase in February, while the annual inflation rate settled at 2.4%. The core CPI, which excludes food and energy, rose by 0.1% in March, marking the smallest 12-month increase since March 2021 at 2.8%. The energy index registered a 3.3% decrease over the past year, and the food index rose 3.0% in the same period. Although the overall numbers offered some relief to consumers, many economists noted that the rate remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target and that underlying inflationary pressures persist.
In tandem with Trump’s partial tariff reversals, certain electronic products—including smartphones and laptops—were temporarily exempted from new duties, a move that provided immediate and visible benefits to companies such as Apple, Dell, and Micron Technology. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average each rose by 0.8%, and the Nasdaq Composite climbed by 0.6%. Automakers like Ford and General Motors gained ground as well, amid signals that auto tariffs might also be paused. Despite this initial market optimism, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick cautioned that while specific products are currently exempt, they could still face tariffs under different classifications in the future. Analysts similarly warned that the exemption was temporary and subject to abrupt policy changes.
Shortly afterward, more details surfaced about the scope of Trump’s tariff measures. His administration had recently imposed a 125% duty on Chinese imports along with additional levies on steel, aluminum, and automobiles, though a 90-day pause on some tariffs was introduced. The latest CPI data for March, released on April 14, pointed to a 0.1% month-over-month decline—the first such drop in nearly five years—driven primarily by a notable 6.3% fall in gasoline prices. While these figures appeared to confirm Trump’s narrative of cooling inflation, many experts warned that the full impact of significant duties still in effect had yet to be reflected in consumer prices. The Federal Reserve, for its part, was closely monitoring these developments, having kept interest rates at 4.25%-4.5% and signaling caution in light of potential future volatility.
Even as a brief stock market surge greeted news of the tariff pause, U.S. markets later suffered steep losses, with the S&P 500 falling 3.45%, the Nasdaq dropping 4.31%, and the Dow Jones declining 2.54%. Investors interpreted these swings as evidence of deepening uncertainty, fueled by skepticism over the long-term consequences of protectionist measures and persistent fears of recession. While the current inflation data indicated progress toward the Fed’s 2% target, the prospect of renewed price pressures linked to shifting tariff policies added new layers of complexity for policymakers seeking to balance stable growth with manageable inflation.
Economists and market observers remained divided on the implications of the latest figures. A 2.4% annual inflation rate can reflect a modest rebound in consumer demand and a potential step toward price stability, yet the underlying economic challenges — including ongoing supply chain constraints, labor market conditions, and energy price fluctuations — continue to complicate any definitive conclusion that inflation has been “solved.” In addition, the administration’s mixed signals on tariffs and other trade policies have raised doubts about whether the moderation in inflation will endure. Some analysts posit that the political instrumentalization of data might overshadow pragmatic economic assessments.
The timing of Trump’s declaration remained significant in an electoral context. By presenting a routine inflation reading as a conclusive victory over price pressures, the president reinforced his central narrative of strong stewardship of the American economy. In doing so, he adhered to a strategy in which macroeconomic complexity is distilled into personalized achievements, a pattern that resonates with supporters but raises concerns among experts who urge careful consideration of long-term fundamentals.
While Trump cites the recent CPI figures as evidence of resolving inflation, observers highlight that persistent tariff regimes and the fluid nature of trade negotiations could reignite upward pressures on prices. For many in the financial community, the short-lived optimism surrounding the partial exemptions underscores both the fragility of market sentiment and the challenges inherent in reconciling aggressive trade policies with stable economic growth. Predictions of further monetary adjustments, including possible rate cuts if conditions worsen, stand as a reminder that even the positive signals contained in the recent CPI data do not guarantee permanent relief from inflationary risks.
Gros News 
Leave a comment