In a striking articulation of his future vision for Meta’s role in the global advertising economy, Mark Zuckerberg has effectively declared war on the traditional ad industry. In conversation with Ben Thompson of Stratechery, Zuckerberg outlined a revolutionary paradigm for AI-powered advertising that promises to bypass every conventional element of the advertising stack—from creative conception to audience targeting to performance measurement—ushering in the era of infinite creative. It is a model where the production of ad content is not simply assisted by AI, but wholly executed and iterated by it, rendering obsolete the web of creative agencies, media buyers, and branding consultants that have undergirded the advertising ecosystem for decades.
Zuckerberg’s statements point to a future in which a business no longer needs to craft its own advertisements. Instead, it simply communicates its commercial objective to Meta, perhaps via a streamlined dashboard interface. From that moment on, Meta’s AI systems would generate all necessary creative assets—photographs, videos, taglines, product descriptions—and dynamically construct an unlimited number of variations. Each ad would be tested, optimized, and delivered in real time to ideal audiences across Meta’s platforms. Not only would Meta handle ad creation and targeting, it would also manage payment flows and performance analytics, completing a full-cycle, closed-loop advertising system. The only thing expected of the client would be to link their bank account and review the output of Meta’s opaque performance metrics.
This vision, as Zuckerberg emphasized, is nearing maturity. The technical pieces are almost in place, and the implications are staggering. Zuckerberg has not merely hinted at this transformation—he has explicitly stated his intent to remove the need for creative input altogether. “You don’t need any creative, you don’t need any targeting demographic, you don’t need any measurement, except to be able to read the results that we spit out,” Zuckerberg said. What he envisions is a redefinition of advertising itself—a service in which human input is marginal, and machine output is totalizing.
The gravity of this shift cannot be overstated. The traditional ad industry—composed of creative directors, brand strategists, campaign managers, media auditors, and consultants—has spent decades erecting complex infrastructures of trust, verification, and measurement to defend against fraud and inefficiency. These systems were developed precisely because of the opacity and arbitrariness of results from platforms like Meta, which have long been accused of inflating metrics or failing to offer third-party transparency. Zuckerberg’s proposal now seeks to replace those critical functions with proprietary AI mechanisms that ask clients not to verify, but to trust the same entity that profits from the outcomes. The promise, or threat, is that Meta will “check its own homework”—a notion that has sent ripples of alarm through the established advertising world.
The reaction from industry insiders was blistering. One advertising agency CEO flagged the issue of brand safety, arguing that allowing Meta not only to disseminate but also to create and optimize ads introduces unacceptable risks. More damning, however, was their core critique: “The promise of his vision—‘just read the results they spit out’—is the problem,” the CEO said. “No clients will trust what they spit out as they are basically checking their own homework.” Another media executive responded even more sharply, calling the phrase “read the results that we spit out” emblematic of a deeper, escalating hostility between platforms and advertisers, characterizing Meta’s trajectory as one that has evolved from “moderate condescension” to “active antagonism,” and now to the brink of industry annihilation: “‘We’ll fucking kill you,’” the executive quipped, capturing the mood of existential threat.
Yet amid this turmoil lies a complex ambiguity. Meta’s current advertising empire is heavily reliant on small- and medium-sized businesses—clients that lack the budgets to engage large agencies or develop bespoke creative content. For these businesses, Meta’s AI-driven advertising tools could represent a major advantage, democratizing access to sophisticated campaign execution that would otherwise be unaffordable. Infinite creative could, in theory, level the playing field by automating expertise and lowering entry costs. But this potential benefit does not negate the profound disruption such a system would impose on the broader advertising economy, nor the monopolistic risk posed by Meta’s vertical integration of every advertising function into a single platform.
Zuckerberg’s remarks confirm what many in the industry have long suspected but few have openly acknowledged: the rise of AI in advertising is not merely a technological shift, but an institutional and economic reordering. Meta is not seeking to augment the existing advertising ecosystem—it is attempting to replace it. And in doing so, it is calling into question the very foundations of how brands communicate, how performance is validated, and how trust is constructed in a world increasingly run by autonomous systems. The battle lines have now been drawn—not just over creative direction or media spend, but over the continued existence of the ad industry itself as an independent entity.
Gros News 
Leave a comment